Showing posts with label 127 Hours. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 127 Hours. Show all posts

Wednesday

Film Retrospect's Top Ten Films of 2010



Honorable Mentions

1. The American


A euro-noir disguised as an assassin flick, and let there be no mistake: The American is geared more towards an arthouse audience than anything else.

It's minimalistic, understated, and sparse with dialogue -- but a mounting sense of tension and paranoia prevent it from becoming a snoozefest. George Clooney gives a mature, enigmatic performance that's full of subtlety and self-reflection. Sometimes less is more, and that seems to be the prevailing aesthetic here for Clooney and director Anton Corbijn.

A slow pace coupled with a european-laced style and backdrop, and also a distinct lack of any extravagent action or set-pieces (not enough explosions or transformers or Jason Stathams) likely baffled the hoi polloi, but the fact that it became such an afterthought this awards season is kind of surprising to me. It's a shame, because The American, I feel, is a deeply misunderstood film, and easily one of the more underrated gems of the year.


2. Never Let Me Go


This one begins as a familiar period drama, but eventually unfolds as a meditative, existential sci-fi romance-drama.

Based on Kazuo Ishiguro's novel of the same name, Never Let Me Go chronicles the lives of three childhood friends who must come to terms with the fact that they are clones being manufactured for their organs.

There's some serious soul searching going on here, and solid performances from Andrew Garfield, Carey Mulligan and Kiera Knightley help us feel the innocence and anguish of these characters. And though at times the sentiment may come across a bit forced, it never becomes too distracting, as Never Let Me Go is surely one of the most unique and emotionally affecting films of the year.


3. Greenberg


An atypical style of film for Ben Stiller, but the role itself suits him well.

Greenberg is the name of the film and the name of our protagonist, who's an eccentric, unlikeable middle-aged man in the midst of a generational crisis. He's in LA to housesit for his brother's family, and it's quickly learned that he once led a promising life in the City of Angels before strangely vanishing to New York.

This film is all about rediscovery. It's also a character study in the sense that Greenberg's delineation is far more important than plot (which there is little of). We, as the audience, are forced to follow this self-absorbed, bitter guy around, and it's not until he precariously falls into the developmental stages of love that we realize that there's an actual character arc at work. In the end, while we might not be able to truly feel for the character, we can at least identify with some of his issues as he attempts to revitalize his life.



Special nods to The Fighter, I Love You Phillip Morris and Animal Kingdom; all quality films.


My top ten of the year after the jump...


Tuesday

'127 Hours' Star James Franco Slams 'The Social Network'

It seems as if 127 Hours star and Oscar co-host James Franco has taken one from Ricky Gervais' playbook with his unabashed slamming of The Social Network, 3D movies and conventional love stories. In an interview with Elvis Mitchell from Movieline, Franco makes such remarks all while sending praise to Danny Boyle's 127 Hours for its unparalleled innovation. He basically declares that The Social Network is classical filmmaking and not really the generational film that some make it out to be. I have to say that I both agree and disagree with what he's saying here.

For instance, The Social Network contains many thematic similarities to David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross and Orson Welles' Citizen Kane. I'm actually inclined to believe that it borrows ideas that were better executed and more fully realized in those films. I also believe, however, that the idea of social disconnect in a time of social and technological convergence is nicely crafted. But in addition to that, I also feel that its ideas are not as universally resonant as the "generational film" enthusiasts declare it to be.

Like Franco, however, I also contain a certain bias towards 127 Hours and Danny Boyle. I would definitely agree that 127 Hours is a more innovative film than The Social Network, and I basically outlined my reasoning for this previously. However, I don't necessarily agree with Franco's examples of "old, boring stuff", because I love films that are driven by dialogue.

I certainly admire Franco for letting loose and being brutally honest, though it does seem strange coming from the guy who will soon be co-hosting the Oscars, where The Social Network seems destined to reign supreme. Maybe he's just tired of all of the hype, as many people are (including me). For what it's worth, I will ultimately agree that The Social Network is as over-appreciated as 127 Hours is under-appreciated. What say you?

Check out the full video after the jump, and take notice of how strange the tone of this interview is. Elvis Mitchell is clearly amused/baffled by some of Franco's comments...

Monday

Post-Golden Globes & Critics' Choice Oscar Predictions

                                                            Photo: Film Linc


The Social Network pretty much cleaned house this weekend at the Critics' Choice Awards and Golden Globes. It's getting to be a little absurd, actually, as this film has dominated nearly every substantial awards ceremony thus far. Have voters been succumbing to groupthink? Or is the film just simply that good? I would say that it might be a combination of the two.

But anyway, we have a pretty good idea of who's a likely winner in most of the major Oscar categories, as a general consensus seems to have been reached. But there could still be a few surprises as far as nominations go, so I'm at least hoping for that.

My predictions after the jump...

Saturday

Ranking the Films of Danny Boyle: Part 1

                                                           Photos: Wikipedia


British filmmaker Danny Boyle made his debut in 1994 with the dark comedy-thriller Shallow Grave, and since then, he's made his mark as one of the most interesting directors in the business. Normally choosing to work outside the Hollywood system, his daring persona is reflected through his ability to genre-hop and take great risks as a filmmaker. This uniqueness as well as his signature blend of hyperactive camerawork and a prevailing theme of hope in his films give him an edge that most filmmakers do not possess. The 2008 surprise hit Slumdog Millionaire won eight Oscars and earned Boyle the coveted Best Director trophy. His new film 127 Hours offers no signs of post-Oscar gloating as he continues to push himself and take great risks as a filmmaker, all while sticking true to the things that make his films so one-of-a-kind.
Here's how I would rank the films of Danny Boyle...


Sunday

Framing '127 Hours' And 'The Social Network'

                                                           Photo: Columbia Pictures


127 Hours star James Franco and The Social Network star Jesse Eisenberg were recently featured on THR's Awards Watch Actor's Roundtable. Franco recently portrayed real-life mountain climber Aron Ralston in Danny Boyle's 127 Hours, while Jesse Eisenberg portrayed Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in David Fincher's The Social Network. Both films have garnered quite a bit of oscar buzz and both Franco and Eisenberg are likely to recieve best actor nods at next year's Academy Awards for their respective portrayals.

At one point in the hour-long discussion, both actors were asked to share their approach on taking on a real-life character. Director Danny Boyle was very much involved with Aron Ralston throughout the entire process of making 127 Hours, as he wanted to make sure to depict Aron's situation accurately and faithfully. As James Franco stated in the roundtable discussion, he did spend some time with Ralston, but mainly entrusted Danny Boyle to steer him in the right direction with the performance.

Also, an interesting point that James made is that no one really knows what Aron Ralston acts like in real life; the general public isn't familiar with the way he speaks or his mannerisms, so this allowed James the freedom to make the character his own in some ways, but while also honoring the fundamentals of Ralston's story.

On the other hand, it is pretty well known at this point that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg hasn't put his seal of approval on Jesse Eisenberg's portrayal of him in Fincher's The Social Network, or the film itself for that matter. In fact, Zuckerberg has gone on record to say that many aspects of Fincher's film are misleading or just totally fabricated. This surely isn't Eisenberg's fault, as he stated in the roundtable discussion that he really wanted to meet and get to know Zuckerberg before filming the movie, but the producers wanted no part of this.

Needless to say, Eisenberg's depiction of Zuckerberg shouldn't evoke many positive feelings about the guy. Aaron Sorkin, screenwriter, basically reduces him to being a socially inept, greedy, selfish asshole. Sure, Sorkin uses Zuckerberg to personify capitalism and corporate america, and I guess he's making the point that Zuckerberg functions more as a computer with all his mechanicalness and social malaise. However, this narrow perspective offers little to no sympathy or redeeming characterization for the guy.

Speaking of Aaron Sorkin's screenplay, it is actually pretty brilliant in many ways. Fincher is obviously a great filmmaker, but in this case I give the most credit to Sorkin, who really made it easy for Fincher. The story is pretty enthralling from the first shot to the closing credits, no matter how skewed it is. The pacing is wonderful, and the dialogue is so sharp that it brings to mind the rythmic, cynical "Mamet Speak" of David Mamet's brilliantly written Glengarry Glen Ross. By the way, that film also has some major capitalist/corporate america subtext.

That said, I do have some small gripes with Sorkin's screenplay, which basically reflect a general problem that I have with the film itself---that being a feeling that the film doesn't know if it wants to glorify or condemn Zuckerberg's behavior. It's a fairly one-dimensional portrayal, and I for one was not very emotionally invested in the character. However, I can't help but feel that Fincher and Sorkin might want us to side with the hipster-cool wit of Mark Zuckerberg as opposed to the douchebag-demeanored Harvard twins whom Zuckerberg maliciously screwed over. We most certainly feel for Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield) but I really can't get behind anyone else.

More on The Social Network and 127 Hours after the jump.